Tuesday, April 21, 2015

Wk.15- Somebody to Love

Hey Y'all. Galileo here.

Djokovic wants love. Not just love he gets from his wife and family. He wants to be loved. Roger walks onto a court he gets a standing ovation. Rafa walks onto court and the people rise like Pop Tarts in the toaster on a cold day. But Djokovic? Yes, he has fans. Yes, he is liked in many places, but is he loved? Is he even universally liked? The French crowd, in fact, actively dislike him. But then they don't really like anybody who doesn't speak French. Except maybe Graf and a few select others.

It's not an exact science. There is no real data on this and it doesn't affect rankings. It does, however, affect the players and the commentators frequently mention it. It is a key component of a match. To get the crowd on your side is difficult, especially in slams. The French crowd are a law unto themselves, Wimbledon cheers everyone equally if they aren't British and the Australian and American crowds just cheer and boo constantly. Those early-tournament five set matches at night on Rod Laver are one of the best spectacles in tennis.

Perhaps because of the constant withdrawing, or the obnoxious attitude that sometimes comes through, Djokovic is not as beloved as Federer or Nadal.

Williams wins all the time. She still gets a warm reception everywhere, she still feels the love. So, what then is the problem with Djokovic?
He does not play a very pretty brand of tennis, but then neither does Nadal and Rafa is still respected and adored across the world. He can be quite arrogant, but then Federer also comes across as arrogant, though a different type of arrogance so it mustn't be that.

For some reason, some indiscernible reason, Djokovic is not getting the standing ovations. It was obvious in the Masters in March. It was obvious in Monte Carlo, too. People don't fall in love with Djokovic in the same way they do with Federer or Nadal. He's the world number one and even at the Australian Open, where he is the five time champ, he doesn't get the attention Nadal or Federer does.

It's a mystery as to why certain players don't mesh well with the fans, but for some reason Djokovic just isn't a fan favorite.

But Novak did win Monte Carlo...

=Rankings Watch=
Top 32: Fognini has dropped to 30, with Giraldo and Chardy rising up a couple places each to 31 and 32. Troicki and Sock both rose and sit at 34 and 35, but Rosol fell two places. Rosol at 33 may still be seeded at a slam, of course.

Top 10: Wawrinka dropped down to ten but he and Cilic [at nine] both have 3,495 points. Dimitrov lurks at 11, just 300 points behind. Ferrer is 995 points ahead at eighth while Lopez is just under 900 behind at 12, which makes it a three horse race at present for the top ten.

Top 8: Berdych has leap-frogged Ferru into seventh and is some 500 points ahead now. Raonic sits at 6, just 110 clear of Berdych. Kei has fallen a place to fifth and is only up on Raonic by 210 points. Expect a big shuffle everywhere after the French.

Top 4: This remains unchanged with Novak holding a big lead over Roger, who holds a lead over Murray. Murray is only 600 clear of Nadal and this is the clay season. The top four spots are vital going into the French. If either Murray or Kei goes into the French seeded fifth, expect trouble.

S: Novak Djokovic def. Tomas Berdych 7-5/4-6/6-3
D: Bryan/Bryan d. Bolelli/Fognini

...Who cares if the crowd isn't with him. He doesn't care. Lendl didn't care and neither did Hingis. They did what they wanted. Having the crowd go against one only affects those without mental fortitude. Djokovic has become the first person to win the first three Masters of the year. He has lost twice, though. He has lost to Federer in Dubai, but who was the other? The answer is below. Djokovic is the world number one right now in every way.

Ramos is a good clay courter and tricky to play as he is a southpaw. Novak was tested but never troubled too much in his 6-1, 6-4 victory. The perfect match to kick off the clay court. Haider-Maurer was up next as Djokovic slowly started to roll. After inflicting a 6-4, 6-0 scoreline on his opponent Djokovic moved through to another Masters quarter. He beat Cilic and Nadal 6-0, 6-3 and 6-3, 6-3 respectively. Both those players won slams last year. One of them has won this event at least seven times. Berdych gave Djokovic something to think about as he put up stern resistance. Novak would not be denied and got by Berdych 6-3 in the third.

It's a rest now for Djokovic. He will not win the French Open but will he take out the other clay Masters? He could well take the first five Masters but ATP BACKSPIN is gonna go out on a limb and say that won't happen.
...Berdie just does his thing. He reaches finals, he makes semifinals at slams, he consistently challenges but he never has to defend all that much so he just stays at seven. Berdman is having a good year and will again be challenging for slam and Masters. Berdych has a very solid game but if it doesn't click, he can panic. He lost to Djokovic 0 and 2 in the China Open final not six months ago. But this week everything clicked. The serve fired and he found his forehand. If he can just not lose his forehand again over the next few weeks, he could take a Masters.
Stakhovsky lost to Berdych 6-4, 7-6[2]. Agut did better in the breaker but still went down 7-6 [7], 6-4. Berdych had been pushed but he had not collapsed. Raonic retired with a foot injury to hand Berdych the match. Berdman took full advantage by easing past Monfils 6-1, 6-4 to set up a cash with the world's best. He even took it to three, but Djokovic is too good right now. He made the semi-final here recently but lost to Wawrinka. It wouldn't be the last time Wawrinka denied him in an important semi-final, either. Berdych has also been to a final here but that was when the courts were...blue.
...Aaah, La Monf! We have a room at Backspin dedicated to the most talented players. The common theme is that they never won anything big and most of them are French. All of them are underachievers, too. Monfils has one of the biggest files. So much talent and so much frustration.
The tournament doesn't matter. His upset of Federer was spectacular, his loss to Berdych disappointing and a big letdown. He beat Dimitrov handily in the quarters and lost just four games to the world's eleventh best player. Yet for all that, he should have lost in the first round to qualifier Alex Kuznetsov.

Here you go. It's so you don't have to:

Monfils continues to play the spanner in the works with aplomb. In general, Backspin on both sides has a soft spot for these players. It's been a while since this has been heard and one of the few times it will ever be uttered here. Oh, Gael. Oh, Nadia.
...Elias has had mentions on Backspin before. He lost badly in the last round of qualifying but he did win a match, He only turned 19 this month. He has done well in the men's Stockholm tournament and Bastad. Here he is. He is the one who isn't Dimitrov. The Swedish looking one.

...This kind of performance from the defending champion is unacceptable. Seeded seventh, the outlook was good after the first match. He eased past Monaco -- serious upset potential in that match -- 6-1, 6-4 and looked to have found his form. Then he lost to Dimitrov 6-1, 6-2. Enough said. With few points to defend coming up, Wawrinka has a chance to push back up the charts so to speak. If he makes the quarters at the French he would make a big leap. Combine that with solid performances at the Masters and maybe taking a smaller title along the way, and he would be a top eight see at Wimbledon almost certainly.
...It feels as if Berdych and Monfils just beat Federer all the time. In fact, Federer leads the head to head with Monfils 8-4 though he did win the first five matches. They first met back in 2006, in a final. Federer leads Berdych 13-6. They don't play as often as they used to but Berdych has always been able to trouble Fed. Some players can find the Fed backhand.

Five things I liked this week...
1 - Nadal and Ferru resumed their clay 'rivalry' this week. It's comforting. It's like the ATP isn't changing so much, after all.
2 - Berdych makes another Masters final. He is sadly 1-3 in those finals and 3-11 in his last 14 finals overall. Still, this is progress. No, really it is.
3 - Kuznetsova is the most successful Russian tennis player ever in the Fed Cup. It makes a nice change for Sveta to be the bride.
4 - The Czechs are dominating the Fed Cup, but can the old empire stop them?
5 - Monfils is finally turning into the player we all knew he could be.

1. Monte Carlo Final – Djokovic d. Berdych 7-5, 4-6, 6-3
...Berdych is also showing encouraging signs here, too. He had an easier draw, yes. Raonic retired but he also beat players of the caliber of Agut and he dismissed Monfils. Nobody expected him to do much in the final but he refused to go away after dropping a tight first set. Then he rebounded from 4-0 down in the third.
2. Monte Carlo QF – Nadal d. Ferrer 6-4, 5-7, 6-2
...Some things never change. These two will still be duking it out in 2030 on some clay court far far away. How often does Nadal beat Ferrer?

3. Monte Carlo 3rd – Monfils d. Federer 6-4, 7-6[5]
...Fed escaped in America but not here. Monfils has really figured out how to play Federer. Monfils is showing he is a legitimate contender for the French. Not a dark horse, a contender. The problem for him is putting it all together over the stretch. Monfils outclassed Federer here.
4. Monte Carlo SF – Djokovic d. Nadal 6-3, 6-3
...Todd and I were chatting in the Clay Court wing of HQ over a cup of coffee about important matters like how excited we are for the new "Star Wars" as this match was going down. I remarked to him that it was sad and nostalgic at the same time to see Nadal lose on the same court he has bludgeoned so many to death before and to lose so convincingly, too. And this match was a sad one for Nadal fans.

Nishikori [1] d. [6] Tsonga
Nadal [2] d. [3] Ferrer
Nadal [2] d. [1] Nishikori

...Weirdly, Nadal will not be the top seed in Barcelona. Then again he will not be the top seed at the French, either. Chances of him winning both of these? Very good.

Karlovic [3] d. [1] Simon
Monfils [2] d. [4] Rosol
Monfils [2] d. [3] Karlovic

...A surprisingly decent field here but Monfils is the form player. Karlovic can actually return Simon's serve and that will be key if that semi comes to pass.

Dellacqua lost to Bertens in the Fed Cup 6-2, 6-3 after beating Rus 7-5, 6-3. She was let down by Gajdosova, who lost 6-0, 5-7, 5-7 after winning the first eight games against Rus. Jarmila also lost to Bertens.

In the doubles Dellacqua and Rogowska lost, too. They now fall to WG II. Dellacqua is not playing for a few weeks but remains in the top forty in both disciplines. What will Australia do if the young stars don't come through soon?

ANSWER: Karlovic was the other person who has beaten Djokovic this year, in Novak's first tournament.

Thanks all and visit WTA BACKSPIN please.

Read more!

Monday, April 13, 2015

Wk.14- Murray Married, Hillary Heroine and Jack's Back

Hey Y'all. Galileo here.

Murray got married.

Sock won on clay.

Djokovic has overtaken Nadal for weeks at number one. He got 142 and can now look to McEnroe's total of 171 or so.

In Backspin HQ we have a non-tennis floor. You have to go sideways for a furlong, then up a bit in the elevator, then- well it's confusing but there is such a floor. On that floor there is an office dedicated to politics. It's between sports and history. And above one of the desks is this picture.

ATP BACKSPIN would like to endorse Hillary Clinton. It's not worth anything but the official stance of ATP BACKSPIN is that Hillary is our woman. This is one of the greatest Presidential announcements there may ever be.

If this wasn't a tennis blog, this post would just be paragraphs and paragraph all about how amazing Hillary is. But I digress. Still, this introduction should be dedicated to her. And now that it has been, the rest of the post can begin...

S: Jack Sock d. Sam Querrey 7-6(9)/7-6(2)
D: Berankis/Gabashvili d. Huey/Lipsky

S: Martin Klizan d. Daniel Gimeno-Traver 6-2/6-2
D: Junaid/Shamasdin d. Bopanna/Mergea


...The way Klizan plays is like a hybrid of Verdasco and Nadal. A big serve is complimented by a forehand with a huge amount of work and pace on it. He has a game that can disrupt any player on any surface. With a serve like that, even grass should be no problem. He barely made it through round one. He beat Brown 6-5, 5-6, 7-6[5]. He got by Almagro 6-4, 7-6[3] in what was an excellent performance. He had a big comeback in the next round, bouncing back to win 4-6, 6-4, 6-0. Beating someone 6-0 in a semi-final anywhere takes some doing. In the final, he cleared out Traver 6-2, 6-2 and barely broke a sweat. Klizan looks now to Monte Carlo where he plays Troicki first up. He should win that. He will be playing the role of dark horse for the rest of the year. He has that kind of a game which could see him dumped out in the first round or get him to the semi-finals of a slam.
RISER: Sam Querrey
...Querrey is yet another example of someone with a lot of talent having a smaller career than expected. Others in this category include Gasquet, Tsonga [actually anyone French] and even Murray. How has Murray won only two slams and never been world number one? He's a better player than that. Querrey once served ten aces in a row. I serve ten aces in a year if I'm lucky. He also has a great forehand and a surprisingly good backhand. He should be a top ten player. He should be challenging for titles every week. But he isn't and it's a mystery.
The Californian benefited from a Matosevic retirement in the first round before beating Johnson 6-1, 4-6, 6-0. The American then put paid to Lopez's hopes as he beat out the Spaniard 4 and 1. He won a three set war against Verdasco before finally running out of steam in the final.
The American as ever hovers somewhere around the 30 mark, but he is a better player than the rankings indicate.
SURPRISE: Teymuraz Gabashvili & Ricardas Berankis
...Alternates is a phrase which means there was no qualifying tournament so we found some guys from the singles and put them in.
Lajovic/Delbonis nearly had the pair but the Europeans won 4-6, 6-2, 19-17. Next they beat the Bryans [defending champions] 7-6[7], 7-5. After beating the top seeds, they eliminated the third seeds. Lindstedt/Melzer were no match and went down 3 and 4. They also proved to be too good against Huey/Lipsky and won 6-4, 6-4. This was their maiden doubles trophy. Alternates is a nice term. It should be used every time the phrase lucky loser would be used. Sometimes, you don't lose but you do get beaten. Alternates is the perfect phrase.
FRESH FACE: Austin Krajicek
...He won a challenger this week. It is the second he has ever won. He made the quarterfinals last time but went three better this time. He beat players like Falla to win the event. He is now ranked 121 and still pretty fresh faced. Backspin will continue to mention him. And when he makes his big break, Backspin will say I told you so.
DOWN: The Bryans
...The Bryans have been rubbish this year. When you're the best, you set ridiculous standards for yourself and your future self. The Bryans have lost their form and they have lost their magic, too. Could the Bryan lose the top ranking for the first time since...since...for a while.
UPSET: Lamine Ouahab
...Ouhab ousted top seed Garcia-Lopez in one of the biggest upsets of 2015. The Moroccan has little ATP experience but was still able to sweep to a 6-3, 6-3 victory. GGL will win a title this year. He will also make a run at the French again. Other than that, it's hard to make too many predictions.

Five things I liked this week...
1 - If Djokovic finishes with more weeks at number one -- but no French Open titles -- is he greater than Nadal? Each week a new dimension is added to the GOAT argument
2 - We’re on clay now. The Twitter and other social media accounts of players were interesting to follow.
3 - First ever Indian women's tennis number one. That's pretty special.
4 - Baseball season has started and my team are doing better than Todd's team. So Ha! [Ed.Note: That's for sure! But it's a 162-game schedule. :)]
5 - The Fed Cup is back. Now that's a special competition.

1. CASABLANCA SF – Klizan d. Dzumhur 4-6, 6-4, 6-0
...Klizan was down 6-4, 4-2. He recovered and never looked back, winning ten games on the trot. Klizan is now 3-0 in singles finals and 3-0 in doubles finals, which is pretty impressive. He has now won a title on the two main surfaces on the tour. Klizan then finished the job with a dominating 6-2, 6-2 rout of Gimeno-Traver in the final.
2. HOUSTON SF - Querrey d. Verdasco 7-5, 2-6, 6-4
...Querrey outlasted clay court expert Verdasco over the course of three sets to advance to the final. Querrey could not simply serve through the Spaniard and so had to use other methods to win. He used his forehand well and, more importantly, showed the grit needed to win through.
3. HOUSTON FINAL - Sock d. Querrey 7-6, 7-6
...In an all-American final, Sock outlasted Querrey over two breakers, winning them 11-9 and 7-2. It was the first all-American final since 2002. Sock rises to 34 in the world. If he can get a top 30 seeding before the U.S. Open [a slam he has won as a junior] he could be a serious threat there.

Nadal [3] d. [1] Djokovic
Federer [2] d. [4] Raonic
Nadal [3] d. [2] Federer

...Nadal has a point to prove. Would anyone pick against him? Federer has a fairly simple draw, especially considering how much form Wawrinka has lost. Don't rule out a surprise player making it to the semi-final. Still, Raonic does perform well here.

Casey Dellacqua again lost to Bencic. She now falls down to 44 in the singles rankings but she would still be seeded at lower level tournaments.
Dellacqua's loss with Jurak to Mirza/Hingis is a historical one. The WTA has its first Indian number one. This country is well in excess of two billion people. And yet only now does it have its first women's world number one. Casey rose six places to 31 in the world in doubles. She may well play in the Fed Cup in s-Hertogenbosch. Yes, that is misspelled.

Thanks all and visit WTA BACKSPIN please.

Read more!

Tuesday, April 07, 2015

Wk.13- Sic semper erat, et sic semper erit

Hey Y'all. Galileo here.

['Twas ever thus and ever thus shall be.]

The clay swing has started up and now the Spaniards all come out of the woodwork. They wait eagerly for when the hard courts give way to their beloved clay. Then they play on the grass, collecting free checks and making up the numbers [not you Deliciano] before gratefully returning back to clay. Alas, after that it is to the hard courts they must return.

This week's case study of the "Spanish Effect" is Sergi Bruguera. He made the fourth round at all the non-clay slams and won a silver medal. In finals, he is 1-3 on hard and 0-2 on carpet. He has no grass finals. On the dirt he is 13-16 in the finals. On clay overall he has a record of 296-135 [.687], which is a bit more than half of his 447-271 career record. He reached world number three.

And the reason for that is he won two French Opens. He won in 1993-94. He, like so many Spaniards, could play just fine everywhere else but it was clay where he truly belonged. Sic semper erat, et sic semper erit.

Ferrer, Granollers, Ferrero, Nadal, Moya and many other Spaniards have performed well and consistently well off the dirt. And yet, they always did best on the it. In much the same way that Pittsburgh has a loveable baseball team right now and a hateable hockey team always, it will be forever a football town.

Spanish Australian Open winners [Open Era]: One
Spanish French Open winners: Six
Spanish Wimbledon winners: One
Spanish US Open winners: Two

The contrast would be even greater were it not for Rafa. But enough of that. What happened in the second week of Miami?

=Round Four=
...Djokovic was a point away from going down a set and a double break. That is now irrelevant. He beat Dolgopolov 6-7[3], 7-5, 6-0. Dolgopolov may well have collapsed, but Djokovic put that doubt in his mind. Djokovic pulled off another stunning victory and would advance to another Masters quarter. Awaiting him there would be Ferrer. He beat Simon 7-6[5], 6-0. It was utterly relentless. Ferrer was not letting his quarry go. Simon fought well but once Ferrer got the first set, the Frenchman's task became Herculean. One break became two and two became three. Ferru used his return of serve to great effect, too. Nishikori demolished Goffin 6-1, 6-2. Kei played Youzhny, Tipsarevic and Goffin. He lost ten games. Isner and Raonic decided to serve really hard for three hours. The result? Isner won in three breakers 3-7, 8-6, 7-5. Nobody said our sport had to be interesting. It's not in the rule book. Isner finally started to look like the real deal. Thiem made his maiden Masters quarter with 7-6, 4-6, 7-5 victory over Mannarino. The Frenchman has never been to a quarter at this level, either. Thiem rose nine place to 43 in the world. His highest ranking is 36. Here's a bold Backspin prediction: Thiem is a seed at the U.S. Open, but not the lowest seed. Anderson lost to Murray 6-4, 3-6, 6-3. Murray, seeded third, had a lot to lose here whilst Anderson could swing freely. Seeded 15, the South African should have been five times worse than Murray. Yet again he acquitted himself brilliantly. Yet again Murray had too much. Monfils retired and sent Berdych through. Ferver has disappointed us all. He went down very quietly to Monaco 6-3, 6-3. Some things never change.
...Ferrer cannot ace his way through matches. Ferrer does not have Gasquet's backhand or Tsonga's forehand. He has a good return and he does not miss. He has a solid serve. He knows how to grind. He is the little Spaniard that could.

It is not enough to simply grind and not miss against Djokovic. The reason Djokovic still struggles to beat Federer is because Federer can attack in many ways. It's why Djokovic struggles against Dolgopolov. Ferrer lacks the variety and in particular the slice to fully disrupt the Djoker. Novak moved through 7-5, 7-5. Isner produced the performance of the round in his 6-4, 6-3 victory over Kei. Kei could not get a read on the serve. Isner used his forehand to good effect in this match. It also means we get to use this picture:

Murray is the master of winning matches he has no right to. Thiem was the better player in this match and Murray should never have won but he did. The Scot took it 3-6, 6-4, 6-1. He was the worse player but still scraped through against the rising star. Ah yes, the other quarterfinal. Berdych held off Monaco 6-3, 6-4. No fuss and no drama. It's just the way Tomas likes it. One day Thiem will make the final here. He can look back on his journey here and know he can do it. He will know he can win it all.
...Anybody can make a Masters semi-final with a bit of luck and a big serve. Ljubicic went all the way back in 2010. Blake had a good record at the Masters level. Nalbandian won Shanghai and Madrid back to back, beating Nadal and Federer in both of those. That was only last decade and he didn't even have a big serve. Isner is the quintessential big server and he knows how to beat Novak. He has done it before. Isner played his game but it would not be enough. Isner could not have done any more than he did. Djokovic just returned and served like a world number one should. He pressured Isner early and often, forcing the big man out of his comfort zone. Isner served a few aces but he could not find anything on Djokovic's service games consistently enough. Djokovic never looked troubled as he won 7-6[3], 6-2. Berdych can beat Murray. At the start of the year he said his goals were to actually beat the big guys. He said he wanted to finally get past these kinda guys. Like all New Year's resolutions, he has not stuck to it. He played the guy not good enough to beat any of the top three and lost tamely 6-4, 6-4. Berdych has improved his game a lot, especially in the second serve department, but he just struggled to get a foothold in the match. He struggled to stamp his authority on Murray. Murray last beat Nadal in 2011. He has lost seven on the bounce to Djokovic, taking just one set. It's been two and a half years since he last beat Federer, who is old. And that is the guy Berdych couldn't beat. It would be another Murray/Djokovic final. It would also be a match with a short highlight reel. Unless, of course, your thing is a series of very long, very repetitive rallies where two players with near identical games try and out-grind one another.
...What the ATP tour needs is chaos. It needs the chaos it had for six glorious years from 1998 to 2004. Guys like Pat Rafter could nick a slam and a few Masters. Federer had his years of dominance. Fedal took over, before Fedalovic became a thing. Murray how now made it very difficult for anybody to break the quartet. Nobody has yet to play the role of Yoko successfully. Novak won Miami [again] in style 7-6[3], 4-6, 6-0. Murray has the tendencies to just fade away in matches. As a top five player it is not acceptable to lose a set 6-0. Djokovic snatched all the momentum away from Murray after being broken to love serving to stay in the second set. Djokovic ground his way to 2-0 and after that Murray folded like a piece of card at an origami workshop. Murray has said he needs to solve the Djokovic problem. It shouldn't be this way, but right now Murray is being outclassed by Djokovic. Djokovic is outclassing everyone. Well, almost everyone.

Murray rises to world number three. Nadal is down at five. Federer and Djokovic are sitting very pretty at 2 and 1. Could Nadal be on the decline? The answer will come in the clay season. If Nadal wins only one Masters title and the French Open, then yes. Nadal will win the French Open. As certainly as Hillary will declare, as certainly as the Nationals will win 100 games, Nadal will win the French Open. The question now is how many more slams for Murray and Nadal.

The most likely answer, if you were to combine their totals is somewhere between 1-3. Of course, that is dependent on injuries. How different would tennis, and indeed other sports, be if injuries did not occur?

Garcia-Lopez[1] d. Youzhny
Granollers [4] d. [WC] Almagro
GGL [1] d. [4] Almagro

...When the second seed is world number 41 and the top seed has never visited a slam quarterfinal, you have yourself a wide open tournament. The fourth seed is last year's beaten finalist, but being the defending champ gives one special motivation.

Lopez [1] d. [4] Isner
Bautista-Agut [2] d. [3] Anderson
Lopez [1] d. [2] Bautista-Agut

...Verdasco won it last year. Another attractive Spaniard with a big serve and forehand will take it this year. There's just something about clay and Spaniards.

Casey Dellacqua will play on the green clay. She and her partner Durak have been drawn ominously close to the second seeds Kops-Jones/Spears but have to beat Klepac/Soler-Espinosa first. In singles, Dellacqua has already lost in the 1st Round to #12 seed Bencic 6-1/6-2.

Here she at the Open Drive from back in January.

Thanks all and visit WTA BACKSPIN please.

Read more!

Monday, March 30, 2015

Miami Mid-way Report

Hey Y'all.

[ I apologize for just how badly I picked the tournament. I picked very badly and I can only offer my apologies. The French Open is going to be even worse. ]

It is eleven years since Federer and Nadal first played in Miami. It is ten years since Federer won in five. Fast forward and Federer is skipping the tournament whilst Nadal is getting hit off the court.

In eleven years, will any players playing Miami now still be playing?

SECTION 1: Djokovic
...Djokovic bested Klizan in three sets, although he only dropped seven games. The Serb defeated Darcis and next plays Dolgopolov. It's not a given. The chances of an upset are very slim, however. Dolgopolov beat Berankis and then Robredo in an epic three set war. Strangely he cruised against Bellucci. He won in two and was untroubled. Hopefully he can produce this kind of tennis.

SECTION 2: Ferrer
...Sometimes a player in a slump or in the October of their career can produce a vintage performance. Mauresmo did it against Safina in 2009 at Wimbledon. Ferrero pulled a few of those. Hewitt beat Raonic by tapping into the magic. Ferrer is having a good year and he beat Delbonis 6-1, 6-1. Rosol strung together a series of good results and he beat talented young star Zverev in two sets here, setting up a match with Ferrer. The Spaniard won in straight sets. Qualifier Falla, who has an interesting rivalry with Federer, set up a clash with Simon next. Simon beat Kukushkin, 6-0 in the third, to give himself a great shot at making the fourth round. Both Simon and Ferrer came through in two sets, though neither was completely straightforward. Please don't put that on a show court. No offence is intended to these wonderful athletes but show courts should be about shot-making. If Djokovic slips, Ferrer has a good shot to make the final. If Ferrer wins he would move even closer to the top five.
SECTION 3: Nishikori
...Nishikori 6-2, 6-1 Youzhny. Nishikori 6-2, 6-2 Troicki. Goffin 6-0, 6-4 Coric. Goffin 6-4, 6-3 Janowicz. Something's gotta give.

Goffin has been on a tear lately and has put together a fantastic past ten months or so. And if Nishikori had done nothing but still made the U.S. Open final it would also have been pretty impressive. As it is, both of them have been playing consistent top ten tennis. Seppi beat Baghdatis 6-2, 6-2. Remember how Sampras retired when he was still pretty good? Remember how Graf retired as the world number three? Henin, Roddick, Borg and even Navratilova retired whilst still pretty good. Baghdatis chose to go down the Nalbandian route instead. Bad call.
SECTION 4: Raonic

...Del Potro may never return to full strength but his star burned ever so brightly. Pospisil beat him in straight sets but then got beaten even more convincingly by Dimi 6-2, 6-2. Isner also moved through with no drama. Gabashvili beat Andujar 0-6, 7-6, 6-3. He couldn't reconjure the magic as he lost to Raonic in two. Chardy produced some proper tennis for the first time in ages and pushed Raonic all the way to a third set breaker. It will be the North American who plays Isner, who defeated Dimitrov on Monday. Del Potro's forehand is the second best forehand since the turn of the century. It's hard to say stuff like that but had Del Potro not been injured, the tennis landscape today would be different.
SECTION 5: Wawrinka
...This is the section which is in a handbasket. And the destination this basket is headed to is hot. Wawrinka edged Berlocq 6-7[9], 7-5, 6-1 but then lost to Mannarino in two breaker 7-4, 7-5. Berlocq on his return to the tour had beaten Kokki. Fognini tanked his match, losing to Sock 7-6[4], 6-1. Lopez kept his head but still lost to Thiem 7-6[4], 4-6, 6-3. With Thiem beating Sock, there will be a surprise in the quarterfinals. Americans in general do suffer from a lack of variety. Though Blake had variety and that variety really helped him. We've moved on from the days in which a Todd Martin can make several slam finals. The crazy thing is, if Murray just has a bad day [he has about two a month] and Anderson can take advantage, Thiem could have a great shot at a semi spot. Rafa is out and if Murray throws in a bad performance, then suddenly the bottom half is as wide open as the Republican candidate election.
SECTION 6: Murray
...Anderson beat Querrey in an epic, winning 6-7[5], 7-6[3], 6-4 but had less trouble in dismissing the Argentine Mayer. Nieminen disappointed here, failing to capitalize on a workable draw here. Anderson is one of the most consistent players in the top twenty. If he is seeded to get to a round, he will be there. Even on clay, Anderson will be there. You may not like the way he plays but you gotta respect the guy. Murray dismissed Young 6-4, 6-2 to open his campaign and then swept past Colombian number one Giraldo 6-3, 6-4. Kyle Edmund was also here but the young Brit lost 6-2, 6-2. Still, he is the great British hope. Murray has a great chance of making the final now but there are still some dangers lurking.
SECTION 7: Berdych
...Chung has had his first taste of the big leagues. In losing 6-3, 6-4 to Berdych, he received a Backspin grade of A-. Of course, Todd can still overrule me if he sees fit but Chung didn't go away. On a similar note I was impressed with Bellis, a 15 year old, avoiding the bagel against the frankly terrifying Serena Williams.

And people wonder why Sharapova hasn't beaten her since George Bush took office the second time. Tomic finally pushed Berdych but still lost 6-7[4], 7-6 [3], 6-1. Smyczek also impressed but it would be the Frenchies battling it out for a shot at Berdych. Monfils beat Tsonga 6-4, 7-6[4] to advance to the fourth round. France is a dying empire now, crippled by injuries and age. They will of course be back. With players like Garcia and Paire, France will still have talented tennis players. It seems to be that Garcia has the touch of Pierce about her and not just in looks. In style of play and verve. Mauresmo and Pierce star in one of my favourite points and pictures:

2000 Pierce Seles - Coup entre les jambes by rolandgarros

SECTION 8: Nadal
...Monaco dismissed Gulbis and GGL. It really was all too easy for him. Monaco has shown signs of rekindling his career. Argentina sure could use a hero. Argentina have so many slams in their history and it's surprising they don't have a bigger event there. Monaco was once in the top ten. Is a return out of the question? Verdasco got past Duckworth 4-6, 6-2, 6-1 to set up an interesting clash between two Spanish lefties. Rafa owns Verdasco but Verdasco has such raw firepower. Nadal had beaten another talented Spaniard, Almagro, handily in the previous round. Verdasco looked good early on, and carried that form on to a 6-4, 2-6, 6-3 victory. Verdasco can surely handle Monaco. With the clay swing coming up, Ferver is getting hot at the perfect moment to ruffle some feathers.

Casey Dellacqua lost both her first round matches. Bencic and the Rodionova sisters put paid to her chances. She has not yet committed to a tournament after this, but may yet take a wildcard.

*4th Round*
#1 Djokovic vs. Dolgopolov
#12 Simon vs. #7 Ferrer
#4 Nishikori vs. #19 Goffin
#18 Isner vs. #5 Raonic
#31 Mannarino vs. Thiem
#15 Anderson vs. #3 Murray
#8 Berdych vs. #16 Berdych
Monaco vs. #26 Verdasco

Thanks all and visit WTA BACKSPIN please.

Read more!

Tuesday, March 24, 2015

Miami Preview: Men's Edition

Hey Y'all.

Having done the ladies, it is now time to do the rest. The ladies are the stars of the shows, after all.

Mirza lost to Hingis last year in the doubles. That won't happen this year -- they're partners. Hingis has had one of the most successful comebacks this side of Clijsters. A former doubles world number one, she is headed there again. Kops and Spears are on form. They reached two finals this year and a slam quarter. They are 1-1 in those finals and played Mirza both times. Stosur/Raymond came back and made the semi-finals in their first tournament back. I picked it and I'm going one further here. Makarova/Vesnina look good. Garcia/Srebotnik are definitely very talented but I like the Russians just that little bit more. Rankings are on the line here, too.

The final? Hingis/Mirza beat Stosmond 0 and 4 in the semi-finals last tournament out. It will be closer, perhaps three sets. The result will be the same.

The Bryans are the top seeds and Sock/Pospisil second seeds. North America is dominant here. The Bryans will make the final, getting past Djokovic/Tipsarevic en-route to a semi-final victory over Bopanna/Nestor. Mahut/Roger-Vasselin have a great tournament and make the semi-finals. Indian Wells finalists Bolelli/Fognini face Klaasen/Paes then Sock/Pospisil. It's too much to expect another run. The young North Americans go to the final and then win against the aging Bryans.

Here's a very bold prediction: after the next Olympics, Hewitt, Williams, Williams, Bryan, Bryan, Federer and Nadal all retire. There will be others, but those will be the big retirees. It will also be Djokovic and Murray's final Olympics.

Now finally the men's singles...

...Big lefties Klizan and Muller await Djokovic. Djokovic will play a breaker or two but neither of those can rally with Djokovic. Berankis, Dolgopolov, Hewitt and Bellucci. They will face off against seeds Cuevas and Robredo. And it just screams for a Cinderella story here.
...Falla qualified. Johnson and Kukushkin are also here with seeds Simon and Karlovic both looking to rebound from disappointing losses. Karlovic and Simon could not have more contrasting games, but the key will be the first serve of Simon. Ferrer may well start off with talented Vesely. Rosol then awaits the Spaniard. The upset is calling Ferrer's name. Ferrer should stand tall here.
...Nishikori commands a quarter of the draw. He is so good at rebounding and he will do it again. Troicki, Baghdatis and Youzhny are just some of the talented players here. Nishikori may drop a serve or two but a set is far more unlikely. Coric and Janowcicz are playing the role of the future in this part of the draw. Goffin and Agut are the seeds here and one of those four is sure to meet Nishikori. It's in the fourth round where Kei will face the big challenge.
Page Break=============================
...Seeded at five, this may be the highest Raonic has ever been seeded at a Masters. It's hard to think of anyone more humble or deserving. Del Potro plays Pospisil for the right to take on Dimitrov. That is hard to call. Chardy and Harrison are the big threats to Raonic here, but the things they can do well, and there are multiple things, Raonic does better. Raonic may have to play Dimitrov and Nishikori back to back.
...Kokkinakis will be dangerous, but does he have the energy to make another run? I think Vavsy is looking to bounce back and will. Mannarino is finally getting the seedings that he deserves and is here at 28. This is a nice little section for the other really good Swiss tennis guy.
If this goes the way the talent is indicating, we get Fognini against Sock playing the winner of Thiem vs. Lopez. It would be good to have that. When Feli gets on a roll, he really starts to roll. And with that bit of momentum, he should flow into the fourth round here.
...Querrey and Estrella lurk here. So does Mayer. But Kevin Anderson is unerringly consistent. He just doesn't ever seem to lose to people he shouldn’t. Kyle Edmund was a good junior and is showing promise. Young is also here and he has beaten Murray. Giraldo is just a time bomb who could detonate on anyone, including himself. Murray has the consistency but he needs to be careful.
...Chung was a very talented junior. The acid test of whether he has translated well to the big leagues is now. Does Tomic have enough left in the tank [no joke intended] to beat Berdych? No. Tomic struggles against Berdych. Krajimovic plays Lajovic in the rivalry henceforth known as the commentators bane. Smyczek is also here. He is the guy that should have beaten Rafa. Tsonga could play Monfils here.
...Monaco and Gulbis here. Oh look, Garcia-Lopez, too. Verdasco and Almagro are here. Federer had an easy section as the second seed last time. It's Nadal's turn.

*4th Round*
Djokovic d. Hewitt
Ferrer d. Karlovic
Nishikori d. Goffin
Raonic d. Dimitrov
Wawrinka d. Lopez
Murray d. Anderson
Berdych d. Monfils
Nadal d. Garcia-Lopez

Djokovic d. Ferrer
Nishikori d. Raonic
Murray d. Warinka
Nadal d. Berdych

Djokovic d. Nishikori
Nadal d. Murray

Djokovic d. Nadal

...really quite straightforward.

Don't forget to go over to WTA BACKSPIN!

Read more!

Monday, March 23, 2015

Miami Preview: Women's Edition

Hey Y'all.

The ladies draw is out, so I'll do a quick run down. I'll cover the doubles and the men's side later this week. The doubles draw isn't even out yet. So here we go. I think you can probably guess who the top seed is...

...The question is how injured is Serena. That's the only thing that stands in her way. She has the young guns in her section like Shelby Rogers and CiCi Bellis. Zarina Diyas also lies here just like in Indian Wells. Diyas may do a little better, but Serena on 40% would probably make the fourth round. Mirjana Lucic-Baroni and Heather Watson are both capable of making runs but Watson's fitness will make a difference here. Angelique Kerber has slipped to 15th in the world. When in a slump it's hard to get out of it. I'm going to stick with Sveta Kuznetsova here. She only has to turn up twice. Surely that's not too much to ask.
...Monica Puig lurks for Ana Ivanovic here. If Julie Goerges defeats Jane Cepelova then she gets Sabine Lisicki. That all-German match up should be good. I just don't know about Lisicki. I think Lisicki and Ivanovic will play in the third round. They've met five times since Stuttgart last year and Ana leads 4-1. The Serb also won 6-3, 6-0 in Dubai this year. Talented Lauren Davis is accompanied by Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova and Vera Zvonareva here. Sara Errani and Garbine Muguruza are the seeds. I like this draw for Muguruza.
SECTION 3: HALEP... err, Vaidisova
...Here in the Vaidisova section Simona Halep is the biggest seed, but who cares? I like Vaidisova to be the Cinderella here and win a match then get a set up on Halep before losing in three. Camila Giorgi is also here. She could upset Halep on her best day. Vika Azarenka vs. Jelena Jankovic and Tsvetana Pironkova vs. Flavia Pennetta looks likely here. I do like the diversity of games and careers in this section. It's like someone put the WTA on shuffle. Azarenka can beat Jankovic. She can beat anyone. And Pironkova? Sadly for the Bulgarian, she isn't playing on grass.
Page Break=============================
...Yaroslava Shvedova, Sloane Stephens and Yanina Wickmayer are here and they could all catch fire and win three matches in a row. Lucie Safarova and Madison Keys are starting to find consistency and I think they will almost certainly clash in the third round. Daniela Hantuchova, Belinda Bencic and Roberta Vinci are in the lower half. I liked Bencic's run in Indian Wells. Switzerland has enjoyed a rich vein of tennis form since about 1990, though without the sheer numbers of Russia or Spain. If only Bouchard and Sloane could pull a Freaky Friday at slams and on the tour. Both need what the other has. Casey Dellacqua is seen here, too, playing a spoiler role.
KEYS D. BOUCHARD [Never underestimate home support. It really helps unless your initials are S.S.]
...If Aga Radwanska just went back to Poland until Wimbledon would anyone notice? A former champion here, she is in dire straits. She struggles on clay and, after this tournament, it's a long time til we leave the dirt. Polona Hercog and Irina-Camelia Begu are also here. They could both go on runs. Hercog has been to finals before, but this isn't her best surface. Tereza Smitkova is also dangerous. CSN has a lovely draw. She is ranked 12, her highest ever ranking. Kirsten Flipkens could be her first match. After that she plays Elena Vesnina or Alize Cornet. To beat Cornet you need to be consistent. That is something the Spaniard can do.
...Sam Stosur and Venus Williams will play out a good match in the third round. Physically they will have too much for Coco Vandeweghe and Kiki Bertens. Stosur struggles against the Williams sisters. Still, Serena is 19-4 in slam finals. Who beat here? Venus, Maria, Venus and Sam. Stosur is the only one not to be number one at some point and the only one to do it outside of Wimbledon. Kaia Kanepi and Varvara Lepchenko lurk here. Both can trouble the Woz. Neither will. And if you think Sam struggles against the Williamses, well, then take a look at ATP BACKSPIN'S "Stat of the Day":

V.WILLIAMS D. WOZNIACKI [Woz is also 1-10 against the younger sister]
...Bojana Jovanovski plays Mona Barthel for the right to play 26th seed Elina Svitolina. One of those three -- they have an average age of 22 -- will make the third round. Svitolina is just 20 and is ranked 27. The other two are at 39 [Barthel] and 65. Does this mean that the 2012 batch of rising stars is already old news? Ekaterina Makarova is also here and she hasn't made a surprising run in about three weeks. Sorana Cirstea plays Christina Mchale whilst Klara Koukalova plays Kristina Mladenovic. BZS and Andrea Petkovic are here, too. This will be one of the most intriguing sections to watch. Petkovic could easily make the quarters or beyond and increase her ranking. She could cement a place in the top ten.
...Annika Beck should play Karolina Pliskova here. When I write the 2019 predictions for this event, they will both be seeded and probably fairly highly. And I'll write what an exciting quarterfinal clash. But we are in 2015. Petra Cetkovska and Peng Shuai are tricky customers. They have a different style of play. Maria Sharapova is 5-1 in semi-finals here, but 0-5 in finals. She has taken one set in a final and that was against Serena. She made the final 2011-13 and the semis last year. Ajla Tomljanovic and Caroline Garcia are in her section. Kurumi Nara, too. Sharapova could play left handed and probably scrape through.

*4th Round*
S. Williams d. Kuznetsova
Muguruza d. Ivanovic
Halep d. Pennetta
Keys d. Bouchard
CSN D. Radwanska
V. Williams d. Wozniacki
Makarova d. Petkovic
Sharapova d. Ka Pliskova

Serena d. Muguruza
Halep d. Keys
V. Williams d. CSN
Sharapova d. Makarova

Halep d. S. Williams [the knee injury has to affect her]
Sharapova d. V. Williams [5-1 in semi-finals]

Sharapova d. Halep

...Halep has struggled to solve Maria, but Maria has struggled to win in Miami. One of those hoodoos has to be broken. Maria can't go 0-6 in Miami finals. There isn't anything more un-Sharapova like.

Thanks all. See you soon!

Read more!

Wk.11- Novak Proves His Credentials Once Again

Hey Y'all.

After all these years, the drill is the same. The WTA BACKSPIN page run by Todd has a large and very interesting post which is generally WTA-themed. This side of Backspin will be focusing more on the ATP, but for the whole tournament overview, next door is the place.

This is the third/fourth post for Indian Wells and the last until next year. I think the top seeds at next year's events will be Williams and Nishikori. Yep. So, let us get down to it. And, yet again, it is a little unusual.

Fourth Round:
...Djokovic beat Isner 6-4, 7-6 in a fairly routine victory here. That gives him a 2-1 lead over Isner at Indian Wells. The two have developed a history there. Also in Djokovic's quarter, Tomic outlasted Kokkinakis 6-4, 4-6, 6-4. It was the best match of the round with both players bringing out all the stops. Tomic used his backhand down the line to great effect. Murray was untroubled in seeing off form player Mannarino 6-3, 6-3. Mannarino is not untalented, but the top ten have a base level of talent which most players just don't have. Or have too much of. Lopez upset Nishikori in routine fashion, 6-4, 7-6[2]. It was one of the upsets of the tournament, but Lopez was just too good and, really, in some ways it doesn't actually feel like an upset. Raonic beat Robredo 6-3, 6-2. It wasn't just the scoreline that impressed, it was the fact that Robredo should be able to disrupt Raonic. Robredo shouldn't be a good match-up for the young Canuck. Raonic had too much power in that match. He even returned well. It was a boring round, this one for the most part. But the most boring of them all? Rafa beating Simon 6-2, 6-4. That's quite dull. Rosol had a fantastic tournament and although he does not go up in the rankings he does not drop, either. Given a seed at the next two slams, he could find a gap and exploit it. In the last few editions of both Wimbledon and the French we have had runs by underdogs. Even if given a low seed, that could be Rosol. Berdych outlasted him 6-2, 4-6, 6-4. Rosol double faulted on match point. Another good run was that of Sock. He had been unseeded but won the doubles and made the fourth round in the singles. He rises 13 places to 45 in the rankings. Not bad. Still, Federer put him to the sword 6-3, 6-2.

So, we now have our quarterfinals. Would there be more drama to come? Yes. Would it match the ladies' drama? Never.
...First things first. Tomic withdrew after a successful week that saw him get back in the top 30 for the first time since 2012. He was number 27 then. A career high ranking surely beckons for him now. At age 22, Tomic has already had a whole career, it feels like. Deliciano Lopez is hot. And so is his form. Deli is at 12, his highest ever ranking, and he consolidated his position there this week. He made a quarterfinal run here but he lost to Murray again. He struggles to beat the Scot but usually puts in a spirited performance. Murray won 6-3, 6-4. The match of the tournament was Raonic/Nadal. Raonic showed his muscles in this encounter. Nadal was in control of the match, having taking the first set 6-4 and showing little fear when faced with the cannon. Rafa was not being blown off the court by a big server like he has been before. Ljubicic, the coach of Raonic, did it to Rafa here in recent memory in a semi-final. Roddick always proved difficult opposition for Rafa, too. Raonic dragged the second set into a breaker and then saved three match points on his way to a 12-10 victory. One highlight included a smash from the ground that clipped the line. It showed great ball control. It was Agassi-like in its execution. Rafa never goes away and so it proved to be. He and Raonic went all the way to 5-5 in the final set. Then Raonic broke in an epic rally before serving it out to claim his biggest ever win.
Federer showed his own muscles in a simple win. Berdych had beaten the people he had to beat in order to reach the quarterfinals and had not had to go through Wawrinka. It is nice when a draw falls ones way even if it draws questions about deserving it and such. Berdych was competitive for the first 40 minutes, but the gulf in class was soon apparent. Federer claimed the first 6-4 and never looked back as he cruised through 6-4, 6-0.

The semi-finals were now set. And it would not be the big four again this time. No, this time they had a young, fresher feel.
...Murray/Djokovic was the marquee match. Murray should have won that final in Australia but he choked just a little. Not enough to hand it to Novak, but enough to allow Djokovic a way back into the match. It would prove to be enough. Usually the recent slam final would indicate this to be a good match. It wasn't. Murray couldn’t serve. We've all had those days where the serve just won't work. Lots of times for the professionals, it's the serve which is the cornerstone of their game. If the serve works, everything just clicks together nicely. For me, it's the forehand and for Todd I think it may be the volley. Every player has a shot that has to work for their game to click. It's usually that shot that works when the rest of the game falls apart. Murray has served his way to wins when the rest of his game is crumbling. Djokovic won 6-2, 6-3 and it felt that one-sided. Murray could never seem to find any momentum. Murray was poor throughout and nothing worked. Djokovic has been superb this whole week. Murray could not find any rhythm on his service games and he paid the price. Murray, Nadal and Nishikori will be swapping around for the rest of the year in the rankings, although the top four is the main goal. Raonic is no longer a Cinderella story. To qualify, you must be on a comeback, [see Bryan's wife or Mardy Fish] a young unproven star [Oudin, Kyrgios] or old and thought to be past it with no seeding or a very low one [Jankovic or Youzhny]. Raonic is about to hit his prime and this week he has already beaten Nadal. He will have to wait to wear glass slippers once more. Raonic hit nine aces and the ace count is usually a good indicator of how he is playing. Federer was aced nine times in his 7-5, 6-4 victory. Yes, it was tight but it was comfortable. Like at Wimbledon, Federer was not troubled too much. Raonic played fine but he could not raise his level adequately enough to live with the world number two. Federer had too much variety for Raonic, using the slice as a weapon. Federer has the world's best slice backhand right now and he knows how to use it as a weapon. It can be really horrible to deal wiith a proper slice backhand. It proved to be one of the differences.

Federer and Djokovic would play each other in another semi...
Final: Djokovic d. Federer
...Have you ever thought about the number one position before? Djokovic is the best player on the planet. 7,303,228,053 people on this planet. Djokovic is better than every single one of them. The German soccer team is the world's best. America is the best country in the world at sport in general. The Giants are the best baseball team in the world, the Patriots are the best. The Spurs too. The Kings rule all in hockey. The number one isn't just a number, it's a thing a team or player or horse has earned. Nadal has 141 weeks, Djokovic 139 and Murray 0. Federer has spent 302 weeks at number one or 5.8 years. His 237 consecutive weeks is equal to a presidential term plus half a year. Steffi Graf was, out of some 6 billion people, the best in the world for 377 weeks: 7.2 YEARS. Graf also had 186 consecutive weeks in the top spot. Chris Evert was number one for 260 weeks and Serena has 233. One serious injury probably ends Williams' career and her body is breaking. Can she hang on and overtake Chris? In consecutive weeks, Evert is 113, Williams 110. Williams should step into third, but in all these rankings Graf and Navratilova are way ahead. Djokovic, world number one right now, had lost to Federer in Dubai recently. Federer's schedule hints that he is making a run at number one, with him skipping Miami to focus on the clay swing. It's feasible Federer could be playing for the top position at the French. Djokovic was too strong in the first hour of the contest. He got to a 6-3, 4-3 lead before Federer broke using some of the old magic. He outlasted Djokovic in the lengthier rallies and forced a breaker. In the breaker, he twice came back from a mini-break down to win the set 7-5 in the breaker. Djokovic was plagued by double faults throughout the match. The Serb once again turned it on in the final set and took the match 6-3, 6-7, 6-2. Federer fought but Djokovic proved his credentials once again. It wasn't a classic, but it was a good quality final filled with drama. It showed that this era is drawing to a close. It may sound foolish to say that, but the signs are there that the big four are starting to crack. Here's how Djokovic felt....

Thanks all. See you soon!

Go to WTA BACKSPIN, too. They have the first barbecue of spring coming up this week. No, really, the weather is warming up where Backspin HQ is. HQ has quite the outdoor area, especially the one slam wonder statue garden.

Read more!

Monday, March 16, 2015

Indian Wells Mid-way Report

Hey Y'all.

So here is the ATP Backspin Indian Wells mid-way point post. There is a much larger and shinier post on WTA BACKSPIN. This post is just to keep the ATP ticking over. It'll be done in sections because it's less awkward and it makes everyone's life easier.

First off, it's a drug scandal for Tomic. The official stance of Backspin is not guilty yet, but also that Tomic seems to attract bad luck whether or not he deserves it. Some of Tomic's off court highlights include wearing a hat, and that pink clothing item thing.

And yet, Tomic is still in the draw (and def. Ferrer on Monday night).

A section-by-section recap of week one in the desert:

...Djokovic has avoided any upset in his first match here, and it was against Baghdatis. Djokovic swept past Bagman 6-1,6-3, furthering the status of Bagman as a journeyman with a successful history. Ramos-Vinolas eased past Benneteau but Djokovic would have eased past whoever made it to him. The Spaniard would be able to push Djokovic on a slow clay court on a damp day. Not here. Isner defeated Anderson Monday night, after both got past their respective opponents, Melzer and Delbonis, in two straight sets. Both have been serving and returning well, and either one of them could have had hope to cause an upset against the Serb in the next round. It'll be unlikely, however, as they lack the multidimensional games needed to beat the world number one. Djokovic, who plays late Monday night, can look ahead to a possible quarterfinal with a dangerously talented Aussie.
...Cilic is gone. He lost to Monaco 6-4,6-4 but it was, in a way, quite expected. Monaco played Kokkinakis Monday evening and was being outclassed early on, but it took winning a third set tie-breaker (after not having a challenge to overturn what would have been a converted match point earlier in the set) to do it after over two and a half hours. This section was always up for grabs in a way. Thanasi has shown he is a top 100 player and the rankings will soon reflect that. Direct entry into a slam this year will happen for him. He beat Struff and Garcia-Lopez just to make the third round. This kid has got something. Meanwhile, Ferrer has struggled. He scraped past Dodig 4-6,6-1,7-6[6]. He looked poor during the two and three quarter hour battle. The Spaniard looked ripe for the upset and Tomic was the last person he wanted to face. Ferrer has shown excellent form all through this year, but he has lost here early before and did again as the Aussie won 7-5/6-4.
...Murray has been given a fairly easy draw and that strangely generates it own pressure. There is a pressure on when you're the best player in a tournament, a section, a city, a Backspin HQ or a planet. One feels like one has to win and that makes it tough. It's easier to be the underdog. Murray dismissed Pospisil and then beat Kohl 6-1,3-6,6-1. Mannarino has made a big run here. The ever improving Frenchman beat talented youngster Zverev 6-4,6-4. He then got past Fognini in an upset on paper, 7-6[8],6-3. The lefty has a very awkward game that seems to work very well on grass. He beat Gulbis 6-4,6-4 to set up a fourth round clash with Murray. He could push the Scot but he won't win. Mind you, Murray did lose to Bogomolov jr. In straight sets. Murray now has a dilemma -- there is a huge step up in quality from the likes of Kohl and Mannarino to the likes of Nishikori. Is he fully prepared for a fight?
...Lots is happening here but nobody is watching. Lopez beat Vasselin 6-7[3],6-4,6-4. In an equally engaging match, Cuevas beat Nieminen 4-6,7-5,6-0. It looked like there may have been a possibility of an all-Spanish clash, but Kei avoided the upset. Verdasco beat Duckworth, whilst Nishikori dealt with Harrison. It's funny how Nishikori is already having to deal with the next generation. Two years ago he was the new generation. Ten years ago, to the year, Nadal was the new generation.

Nishikori beat the big hitting lefty 6-7[6],6-1,6-4. He just keeps going from strength to strength. Nishikori needs to prove one again he belongs in the top ten. Has he beaten two top five players back to back? At the U.S. Open, yes. Can he do it again? He is playing for a spot in the top four.
...Welcome to the bottom half of the tournament. This is Raonic's particular bit of it and, thus far, he has kept it tidy. He beat Bolelli 6-3,6-4. He won't be happy with Dolgopolov beating Giraldo. Dolgopolov is ultra-multidimensional. Unfortunately, he is so ultra-multidimensional not even Dolgopolov himself can harness it. Robredo ,the invisible man, struggled past Golubev 6-4,6-7[5],6-4. Kyrgios served for the match against Dimitrov but lost 7-6,6-3,7-6. It wasn't his fault. He went for a ball and fell, twisting his ankle, on the final rally of Dimitrov's game. Dimitrov couldn't put the ball into the court and so lost his serve. Kyrgios couldn’t put any weight on the ankle and so failed to close (he'll now miss two to four weeks). Dimitrov now plays another one-
hander. The winner gets a big server. How far can the serve carry the Canadian? If the serve fails, so does he. So long as it keeps booming, his game stays intact. He could serve his way to the final. Or he could throw in a performance like the one against Djokovic in Australia where he struggled to compete for portions of the match.
...These days one never knows how Rafa is playing. He barely broke a sweat in beating Sjisling 6-4,6-2 but he could just lose inexplicably on any given day. His partner, Busta, was beaten by Donald Young. Young won in straight sets and then beat Chardy by the same score line Rafa beat the Dutchman. Rafa has Young and then Simon, probably, up next. They can both trouble Rafa or even cause the upset. Simon beat Jaziri in three long sets. Becker got through because Gasquet withdrew. Something is not right in the Gasquet camp. In any case, Simon has a good chance to make the semi-finals now. Any genuine chance to make the semi-finals of an event such as this is a good chance. Rafa struggles against big servers. This has been documented many times. Backspin HQ has a special folder, in the Weaknesses filing cabinet, on Rafa and big servers. John Isner at the French is a good example. Beforehand, Bollettieri said Isner, for one, needs to "put a firecracker up his a--,". Isner did and it was quite a match.
...The first big seed is gone. You wouldn't have called it beforehand. You would've called Ferrer or, perhaps if you were feeling brave, Nishikori. Wawrinka is one of the form players. He could probably carry me to a doubles title on the form he had been in. But his loss to Haase was really bad. The Dutchman won 6-3,3-6,6-3 and now plays Rosol. The Czech beat Klizan in three, including a bagel. Berdych has a great opportunity now. He was too strong for Stakhovsky and now has a gilt-edged chance to make the quarterfinals. Johnson beat Karlovic in two and now Berdych doesn't have to face that serve. Johnson is on form and Berdych will be wary of the upset. Tomas has to take his chance. Querrey disappointed here. He needed to do well here to up his ranking. The American men need all they can get right now.
...The comforting presence of the man with many nicknames. One commentator said this week, "When you've won 17 grand slams, umpires call you by your first name." Against Schwartzman, Fedex messed around, hitting drop shots and chip-charging before he finally got bored and took it 6-4,6-2. How many sections and halves of draws has Federer commanded over the years? Sock beat Lu 6-7[4],6-2,7-5. Then he beat Muller 3-6,6-3,7-6 [7] but he still has work to do. He must beat Agut, who easily dismissed Istomin. Then he has to beat Roger Federer. Sock would love a chance to play Roger but, despite having already earned it, he must win one more match to make it happen. With Stan out, Berdych looms after Seppi and Agut. None of those matches is a given but Federer will want revenge against Seppi. The bigger question is will Federer ever get a better chance at beating Rafa again if they meet in the semi?

Thanks all. See you soon!

Go to WTA BACKSPIN, too, don't forget.

Read more!

Wednesday, March 11, 2015

Indian Wells Preview (Men's Edition)

Hey Y'all.

Happy World tennis day! The highlights included Sabatini's backhand and Federer losing a point to a kid.

Full highlights here:

This is one of the better matches of the 2015 WTA...

Murray has hired Bjorkman. Serena has said that Steffi's record is on her "to do" list. Still, it's unlikely she will be able to win every slam at least four times like Graf did.

The men's draw and both doubles draws are out. Peers/Zvonareva, Stephens/Townsend, Lisicki/Petkovic, Ivanovic/Kerber and, best of all, Stosur/Raymond are just some of the very exciting doubles pairings we have. I like Hingis/Mirza to beat Raymond/Stosur and then beat Makarova/Vesnina. The Russians will beat Hsieh/Pennetta.

Anderson/Melzer play the Bryans. Del Potro returns [he made the final here in '13] with Cilic. Kokkinakis plays with Andy Murray and Federer will take on Sock/Pospsil with Lammer. Nadal is with Busta. Qureshi/Raonic play Klaasen/Paes. Dimitrov/Fish is another pairing. Yes, that Fish. His comeback had been noted on Backspin. So many comebacks in these doubles. Fish/Dimitrov play Ferrer/Verdasco. I like Benneteau/Roger-Vasselin to make the semis but lose to Dodig/Melo. The Bryans will beat Peya/Soares and then win the final. Doubles is very difficult to pick, but there it is.

Qualifying this year is very strong. It could be a legitimate field at a 250: http://www.bnpparibasopen.com/en/2015-live/draws

Now, finally, onto singles action.

...Djokovic is defending huge points in this month. If he slips he loses the world number one ranking to some old guy. He could play Baghdatis, Benneteau and Anderson or Isner. He can't afford to slip up, and that is an unpleasant draw. They can all irritate him, but can they beat him? Isner/Anderson will be on centre/center court, possibly at night. Expect the Isner in America factor to come into play. Delbonis and Lajovic are also here as are two, probably very talented qualifiers.
...Tomic is in Ferrer's section as the 32nd seed. He can cause an upset there. I think Ferrer eases past Dodig or Haider-Maurer before dealing with Tomic. Tomic will rise to around 33 in the world whilst Ferrer will also rise. Kokkinakis will rise to about 105 if he makes the fourth round. A shaky, returning from injury Cilic and Garcia-Lopez are here. I think this the time for the young Aussie. He should beat Struff and then he should beat GGL. Can he beat Cilic, if Cilic makes it? I'm willing to gamble.
...Nadal would fall into Federer's half. Of course he would. The Tennis Gods are having a chuckle up there. Murray plays Pospisil or Kukushin first up. He won't lose but he will be pushed. It's a good first match. Kohlschreiber likely awaits next. Murray should again be fine there if the German even makes it. Fognini and Gulbis lie here, accompanied by qualifiers, Groth and Mannarino. Gulbis has played well here before. Nobody is expecting him to do well. So for that reason and the fact he isn't utterly mentally outmatched for once he gets the nod.
Page Break=============================
...This section is a bit strange. Lopez will beat Muller and Cuevas -- or Nieminen -- and look good doing it, too. This half of the section is fairly straightforward, which makes for a refreshing change. Verdasco plays Thiem or a qualifier. Nishikori plays Harrison or Fish. Imagine a night match with a raucous, perhaps even slightly tipsy, crowd. Imagine one of the Americans finds the zone, that magical place where everything goes their way. Could there be an upset? Yes. But really...
4th Rd.: NISHIKORI D. F.LOPEZ [or D for Deliciano if you prefer]
...Mines! Mines everywhere! Luckily Raonic has bombs of his own. He should navigate Bellucci/Bolelli fairly easy, but Dolgopolov or Giraldo are a lot more unpredictable. Milos likes rhythm. He won't get it in this section. Dimitrov likely gets Kyrgios, a fresh but rusty Kyrgios. Kyrgios plays a little like Tsonga, but is a slightly worse mover. He could overpower the Bulgarian. Still, the Bulgarian should beat the Aussie and Robredo, too.
4th Rd.: RAONIC D. DIMITROV [This has classic written all over it, but Raonic is higher ranked. I use that as a deciding factor sometimes like here]
...In this, the French section, Nadal should cruise. He should open with Sisjling and then Chardy. On this court both can delay him and attack him but not for more than a set, let alone three. Gasquet is better than Simon. He leads the head to head comfortably 4-1. Estrella Burgos is also here and he is ready to cause trouble. The French have the numbers and it looks like Spain beats France twice in a row here.
...Funny, funny Gods. Putting Wawrinka between the two players he can never beat. He at least does better than Ferrer against Fedal. He plays Haase or a qualifier first. Andujar versus Klizan is a toss up and, with the winner playing Rosol, Wawrinka has an unpredictable route to the quarters. Querrey, Johnson, Karlovic and Berdych are all here. Expect breakers. If you like big servers, I have the section for you. Karlovic is the wild deuce here. He has payed so well of late whilst Berdych has just slipped. Querrey will likely play Berdych, too. I haven't called an upset in a while.
...Nearly finished taking up your time, till Sunday at least. Fed gets Janowicz first up in all likelihood. Afterwards he gets Seppi or Youzhny, and expect revenge here although avenging such a tough loss doesn't make it feel any less painful. Agut, Istomin, Mayer, Sock. Enough said.

*Round of 16*
Djokovic d. Isner
Ferrer d. Kokkinakis
Murray d. Gulbis
Nishikori d. Lopez
Raonic d. Dimitrov
Nadal d. Gasquet
Wawrinka d. Karlovic
Federer d. Mayer
Djokovic d. Ferrer
Nishikori d. Murray
Raonic d. Nadal
Federer d. Wawrinka
Djokovic d. Nishikori
Federer d. Raonic
Federer d. Djokovic

...Going on form, that seems to be fairly accurate. Federer is playing very well, Djokovic less so and Murray even less so. Kei has picked it up since Australia whilst Raonic has stayed in the zone.

Thanks all. Casey Dellacqua is sadly not in Indian Wells this year, meaning she will be losing a lot of ranking points. Don't forget to go over to WTA BACKSPIN!

Read more!

Tuesday, March 10, 2015

Indian Wells Preview (Women's Edition)

Hey, Y'all.

The ladies draw is out so I'll do a quick run down...

...The 2007 Australian Open. The 2012-14 U.S. Open. Serena had a point to prove. Serena won those tournaments. I can't remember the last time she went into a tournament and wasn't the favorite. Perhaps on slow clay there may be a question mark. That's it. I think Serena will be nervous , but she'll also be angry. She will play Niculescu or Krunic in her first match. I think she looks nervy and struggles a bit but wins 7-5,6-2 or something close to that score. Then she just rolls and never looks back. Vekic and Diyas could play each other, which would be interesting. Stephens is also here, as is 13th seed Kerber. But I pick Sveta, seeded #23, to avenge her recent loss to the German. Kerber has not been in form whilst Sveta is a former winner.
4th Rd.: #1 SERENA D. #23 KUZNETSOVA
...Naming the sections after their biggest seed is just easiest and I'm surprised Makarova has her own. She is no longer the perennial dark horse. She should beat Vesnina or the qualifier who the Russian plays. Bacsinszky, seeded #27, lies here and is on form, but Makarova will be fine. Safarova will get past the young guns of Svitolina, Mladenovic and Nara before falling to the more solid Makarova in the fourth round. That will be a match to watch.
4th Rd.: #8 MAKAROVA d. #10 SAFAROVA
...Halep will beat Lepchenko in the third round and advance to the fourth to meet a rising star. A lot of rising stars in attendance.
Tomljanovic can only represent Australia in ITF events. Pliskova and Muguruza play here -- it's the match the WTA has been waiting for. I think Pliskova edges it [literally a toss-up] but it will be an incredible watch. The winners goes down tamely to Halep.
4th Rd.: #3 HALEP D. #14 KA.PLISKOVA
...Radwanska has been quiet of late. That makes us here at Backspin very nervous. Lucic-Baroni is here. Goerges and Watson play one another. Gibbs and Pavlyuchenkova are in this section, too. Puig is also hanging around. Giorgi beats Radwanska, who is in a big slump and so puts on her glass slippers. Suarez Navarro outlasts the catty BZS in three long sets. Giorgi improbably beats Navarro and Todd has his story for the first week. Unless ,you know, Sharapova double bagels Azarenka or Serena implodes.
...Look who has her own section. She and Raonic really are an incredible pair. If only there was a big mixed doubles event that only happens rarely coming up in the next year or two. They'd do well, in that. [#Rio2016] Eugenie has Cepelova and Pironkova around here, not to mention thirtieth seed Vandeweghe. Bouchard advances. Petkovic has Cetkovska, Cornet, McHale and Beck around her. Talented women, but the German ninth seed comes through no problems. Lacking in form, the Canadian will lose to the German. Sadly for Eugenie, in the real world this doesn't work:

...Wozniacki is again rising without winning a slam. Up to number five now, I struggle to think of what the Dane has actually done in the past few months aside from the odd final and losing to Serena in NY. To be honest, that NY final was six months ago now. The Dane hasn't done a lot. She should beat Kanepi or the qualifier, but 31st seed Bencic poses a bit more of a problem. I still like the Dane to advance. Schmiedlova and Davis play in the young match, whilst Koukalova takes on Hantuchova in the veterans. Hantuchova has won this before. At #16, Keys is two spots higher than Jankovic but both are on different trajectories now. If Jankovic makes it there Keys will dismiss her.
4th Rd.: #16 KEYS D. #4 WOZNIACKI [Oh, why not]
...Do I trust Ivanovic? With my keys, yes. To be solid and not lose to someone she shouldn't? No. She will beat the winner of Zvonareva and Garcia and then the rest of this section is, first, Italian and, secondly, a mess. Apart from Gajdosova -- she isn't Italian -- Vince, Schiavone and Errani are here, but Gajdosova beats them all. The Aussie is on form and could make the quarterfinals if she finds her groove. Jarmila is back in the top 50. Oh yes, Lisicki is here, too. I forgot about her. It isn't grass.
...What a nasty draw. Knapp or Wickamyer then Azarenka followed by Pennetta before having to face Ivanovic. That stinks. Rogers and Flipkens play for the right to face Vika. Vika wins but loses to Sharapova. I know I'm wrong, but the percentage play is to pick Maria. I am not throwing the ball on the one yard line here. Brengle or Zheng [not that Zheng -- Saisai] will get through and play Pennetta. Flavia is 4-4. It's March. She loses to one of those two or to Stosur despite the match up problem the Aussie has. Stosur just kicks and spins her way into the fourth round. Mattek against Townsend is interesting, especially as the winner plays Sam. Poor Sam never beats Vika or Maria.
4th Rd.: #2 SHARAPOVA D. #21 STOSUR

Serena d. Kuznetsova
Makarova d. Safarova
Halep d. Pliskova
Giorgi d. Suarez Navarro
Petkovic d. Bouchard
Keys d. Wozniacki
Ivanovic d. Gajdosova
Sharapova d. Stosur
Serena d. Makarova
Halep d. Giorgi
Petkovic d. Keys
Sharapova d. Ivanovic
Serena d. Halep
Sharapova d. Petkovic
Serena d. Sharapova

...This for me is the big one. Not the match, that won't be a contest. Serena will win easily, but it will be the one she has wanted for so long. She puts her demons to bed here.

Thanks all. See you soon!

Read more!